Request for comments on E-Rate
Proposed Rulemaking
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING FCC 05-124
Adopted: June 9, 2005 Released: June 14, 2005NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING FCC 05-124
Comment Date: 90 days after publication in the Federal Register
Reply Comment Date: 150 days after publication in the Federal Register
Excerpts . . .
E-Rate. We seek comment on suitable outcome, output, and efficiency measures for the Erate program. In the past, the Commission used the percentage of public schools connected to the Internet as a measure of the impact of the E-rate program and its success, and we seek comment on continuing to use connectivity as a measurement. We seek comment on the value of continuing to use this goal for the purposes of measuring the impact of the Erate program.
69 We seek comment on whether we should also measure the connectivity of libraries or private schools. We seek comment on whether alternative or supplemental goals may be more appropriate than connectivity. Universal service is an “evolving level of telecommunications services” that includes advanced services.
70 We seek comment on how we can take the evolving level of services into account in adopting performance measures. We also seek comment on ways to measure the extent to which broadband services have been deployed to classrooms, through the E-rate program. One possibility for measuring the impact of E-rate moneys on schools and libraries would be to collect data on the use of E-rate supported services. For example, we could measure the number or percentage of students access the Internet or the number or percentage of teachers using supported services in their classrooms.
...We therefore seek comment on how we should design performance measurements to measure broadband connectivity...
71 The EETT program funds initiatives that are designed to integrate technology into classrooms in ways to improve the academic achievement of students. These performance measures allow the Department of Education to respond to Government Performance and Results Act (“GPRA”) reporting requirements. We seek comment on whether these measures are instructive for E-rate purposes.
28. We also seek comment on meaningful ways to distinguish the impact of E-rate funds from other governmental and non-governmental programs that support services or facilities similar to the Erate program.
(There's much more . . .see Federal Register posting for many, many more pages . . .)
